Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 111
Filter
1.
Burns ; 49(4): 757-769, 2023 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20235187

ABSTRACT

Self-immolation is the act of setting fire to oneself. Recent spikes in self-immolation events have been noticed in the Arab world, specifically in the aftermath of the Arab Spring in 2011. We aimed to examine the literature assessing the characteristics and patterns of suicide by self-immolation in the Arab world. We registered our systematic review in Prospero. We searched PubMed, Medline, PsycInfo, Embase, and Scopus databases from inception until 9 July 2022, along with other sources, following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. We collected relevant articles tackling suicide by self-immolation in the Arab world via title and abstract screening followed by full-text screening. We then conducted a narrative synthesis of the results. Out of 326 records from databases and 17 additional records identified through other sources, 31 articles (27 quantitative and 4 qualitative) were included. The studies came from Iraq (n = 16), Tunisia (n = 6), Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (n = 3), Jordan (n = 2), Libya (n = 2), Bahrain (n = 1), and Egypt (n = 1). The quantitative studies had a sample size ranging from 22 to 600 self-inflicted burn victims. Studies showed that self-immolators were mostly married women with low educational level and low socioeconomic status. Self-immolation was more likely to happen at home, usually following marital conflicts. Kerosene was the accelerant used the most. Depression was the most comorbid mental health diagnosis. Studies highlighted that self-immolation was being increasignly used as a form of protest. Self-immolation is not uncommon in the Arab world. Specific interventions directed at the population at risk are warranted.


Subject(s)
Burns , Suicide , Humans , Female , Arab World , Burns/epidemiology , Burns/psychology , Suicide/psychology , Marriage , Educational Status
3.
Burns ; 49(4): 983-984, 2023 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2313643
4.
Ann Plast Surg ; 90(6): 551-558, 2023 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2314767

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Inflicted burns on children are a particularly difficult medical and psychosocial issue. Pediatric nonaccidental burns (PNABs) are unfortunately relatively common. In our study, we aim to present the key findings on PNABs with the intention of raising awareness, improving early, and recognizing accurately by identifying red flags, developing triage tools, and establishing prevention strategies for this sensitive issue. METHODS: A computerized literature search was conducted on PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane for articles published until November 2020. The online screening process was performed by 3 independent reviewers with the Covidence tool against set inclusion/exclusion criteria. The protocol was reported using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) protocol. The study was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). RESULTS: A total of 12 studies were included for analysis. Scald burns via forced immersion accounted for the majority of reported PNABs affecting both feet and hands. Complications included wound infection, sepsis, requiring systemic antibiotics, or intensive care. Abused children's parents had a history of mental illness, unemployment, substance abuse, incarceration, and/or low annual income. CONCLUSIONS: Scalds via forced immersion remain the most common mechanism of PNABs. All health care professionals must remain vigilant, be able to recognize subtle signs of abuse, triage patients appropriately, report to police and/or social services, and ensure no further harm is made to the child or children. Repeated abuse with burns can lead to death. Prevention and education are the cornerstones for addressing this social phenomenon.


Subject(s)
Burns , Child Abuse , Child , Humans , Burns/diagnosis , Burns/etiology , Burns/prevention & control , Child Abuse/prevention & control
5.
J Burn Care Res ; 44(2): 373-380, 2023 03 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2287806

ABSTRACT

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) can significantly impact quality of life. Reddit allows users with common interests, like HS, to form a community and share information. This has become increasingly important with pandemic-related social isolation. We administered a survey from May 2021 to July 2021 to characterize patients with HS use of Reddit and social media more broadly before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. An analysis of a popular HS support page on Reddit from January 2019 to August 2021 was also conducted, analyzing subscribers over time. The rate of subscriber increase was higher before the pandemic. Of 42 patients contacted, 20 patients enrolled (90% female, mean age of 32.4 years) and 18 of the 20 fully completed the survey that was administered. Participants were stratified into two groups: online support group users (n = 8) and nonusers (n = 12). There were no differences in sex, age, education level, antidepressant usage, and overall social media usage between these groups. However, there was a difference in Hurley staging, with more than four times as many users reporting a Hurley III staging compared to nonusers (p = .003). Nonusers ranked the following as desired features of a social media group more frequently than current users: bandaging/dressing boils, living with HS, medical advice from professionals, causes of HS, and diet (P = .047, P = .043, P = .043, P = .047, and P = .013, respectively). This study demonstrates that online support group use is associated with HS of higher clinical severity. Based on the needs/expectations identified in this study, recommendations can be made to providers to help fill any lacunae in clinical care.


Subject(s)
Burns , COVID-19 , Hidradenitis Suppurativa , Social Media , Humans , Female , Adult , Male , Hidradenitis Suppurativa/therapy , Pandemics , Quality of Life , Self-Help Groups , Severity of Illness Index
6.
Burns ; 48(6): 1301-1310, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2276713

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Worldwide, different strategies have been chosen to face the COVID-19-patient surge, often affecting access to health care for other patients. This observational study aimed to investigate whether the standard of burn care changed globally during the pandemic, and whether country´s income, geographical location, COVID-19-transmission pattern, and levels of specialization of the burn units affected reallocation of resources and access to burn care. METHODS: The Burn Care Survey is a questionnaire developed to collect information on the capacity to provide burn care by burn units around the world, before and during the pandemic. The survey was distributed between September and October 2020. McNemar`s test analyzed differences between services provided before and during the pandemic, χ2 or Fisher's exact test differences between groups. Multivariable logistic regression analyzed the independent effect of different factors on keeping the burn units open during the pandemic. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 234 burn units in 43 countries. During the pandemic, presence of burn surgeons did not change (p = 0.06), while that of anesthetists and dedicated nursing staff was reduced (<0.01), and so did the capacity to manage patients in all age groups (p = 0.04). Use of telemedicine was implemented (p < 0.01), collaboration between burn centers was not. Burn units in LMICs and LICs were more likely to be closed, after adjustment for other factors. CONCLUSIONS: During the pandemic, most burn units were open, although availability of standard resources diminished worldwide. The use of telemedicine increased, suggesting the implementation of new strategies to manage burns. Low income was independently associated with reduced access to burn care.


Subject(s)
Burns , COVID-19 , Burn Units , Burns/epidemiology , Burns/therapy , COVID-19/epidemiology , Delivery of Health Care , Humans , Pandemics
7.
ANZ J Surg ; 93(3): 566-571, 2023 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2243598

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Burn outcomes can be improved by reducing mortality and hospital admission duration. This increases patient quality of life and reduces hospital-associated complications and costs. This study aimed to develop a model with which to predict burns inpatient mortality and admission duration. METHODS: Multiple logistic and linear regression were used to investigate mortality and admission duration by age, total body surface area, sex, delay to presentation, the use of surgery, discharge distance and period. RESULTS: One thousand four hundred and seventy nine patients (747 pre-COVID and 732 during COVID) were admitted between the study dates. Using multiple logistic regression, age and total body surface area predicted mortality LR X2 (5), P < 0.001, pseudo R2  = 0.57. Using multiple linear regression, age, total body surface area and the use of surgery predicted admission duration F (7, 1455) = 161.42, P < 0.001, R2  = 0.44. Sex, delay to presentation, period and discharge distance did not predict mortality or admission duration. CONCLUSIONS: In our institution, mortality was increased by 8.6% for each additional year of age and by 11.3% for each additional percentage total body surface area. Likewise, admission duration was prolonged by 1 day for every 7 years of increased age, by 1 day for each additional percentage total body surface area or by 7 days if surgery was required. These models have been incorporated into a set of prediction tables for mortality and admission duration for use in our institute that can guide patient and family discussions.


Subject(s)
Burns , COVID-19 , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Retrospective Studies , Queensland/epidemiology , Quality of Life , Australia , Length of Stay
8.
J Burn Care Res ; 42(2): 135-140, 2021 03 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2152044

ABSTRACT

Coronavirus disease 2019 obliged many countries to apply lockdown policies to contain the spread of infection. The restrictions in Israel included limitations on movement, reduction of working capacity, and closure of the educational system. The present study focused on patients treated at a referral center for burns in northern Israel. Their goal was to investigate temporal variations in burn injuries during this period. Data were retrospectively extracted from the medical records of burn patients treated at our hospital between March 14, 2020 and April 20, 2020 (ie, the period of aggravated lockdown). Data from this period were compared with that from paralleling periods between 2017 and 2019. During the lockdown and paralleling periods, 178 patients were treated for burn injuries, of whom 44% were under 18. Although no restrictions were enforced during the virus outbreak period with regard to seeking medical care, we noticed a decrease in the number of patients admitted to the emergency room for all reasons. Of particular interest was a 66% decrease in the number of adult burn patients (P < .0001). Meanwhile, among the pediatric population, no significant decrease was observed. Nonetheless, subgroups with higher susceptibility to burn injuries included children aged 2 to 5 years (56.3% vs 23.8%, P = .016) and female patients from all pediatric age groups (57.1% vs 25%, P = .027). These findings may be explained by the presumably busier kitchen and dining areas during the lockdown. Overall, the study results can assist with building a stronger understanding of varying burn injuries and with developing educational and preventive strategies.


Subject(s)
Burns/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Intensive Care Units/organization & administration , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Burn Units/organization & administration , Burns/therapy , Child , Child, Preschool , Emergency Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Female , Forecasting , Humans , Infant , Israel , Male , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
10.
J Burn Care Res ; 43(6): 1233-1240, 2022 11 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2001344

ABSTRACT

Due to COVID-19, hospitals underwent drastic changes to operating room policy to mitigate the spread of the disease. Given these unprecedented measures, we aimed to look at the changes in operative volume and metrics of the burn surgery service at our institution. A retrospective review was conducted for operative cases and metrics for the months of March to May for 2019, 2020, and 2021, which correspond with pre-COVID, early COVID (period without elective cases), and late COVID (period with resumed elective cases). Inclusion criteria were cases related to burns. Case types and operative metrics were compared amongst the three time-periods. Compared to the hospital, the burn service had a smaller decrease in volume during early COVID (28.7% vs 50.1%) and exceeded prepandemic volumes during late COVID (+21.8% vs -4.6%). There was a significant increase in excision and grafting cases in early and late COVID periods (P < .0001 and P < .002). There was a significant decrease in laser scar procedures that persisted even during late COVID (P < .0001). The projected and actual lengths of cases significantly increased and persisted into late COVID (P < .01). COVID-19 related operating room closures led to an expected decrease in the number of operative cases. However, there was no significant decline in the number of burn specific cases. The elective cases were largely replaced with excision and grafting cases and this shift has persisted even after elective cases have resumed. This change is also reflected in increased operative times.


Subject(s)
Burns , COVID-19 , Humans , Burns/surgery , Skin Transplantation/methods , Cicatrix/surgery , Retrospective Studies
11.
Burns ; 48(7): 1584-1589, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1982665

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Optimal burn care includes fluid resuscitation and early excision and grafting. During the COVID-19 pandemic, resource-constrained environments were susceptible to interruptions in burn care. We sought to characterize pre- and intra-pandemic burn-associated outcomes at a busy tertiary hospital in Malawi. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of burn patients that presented to Kamuzu Central Hospital Lilongwe from 2011 through December 2021. We compared patients based on whether they presented pre- or intra-pandemic, starting on March 11, 2020, the date of official WHO designation. Comparing these cohorts, we used modified Poisson modeling to estimate the adjusted risk of undergoing an operation and the risk of death. RESULTS: We included 2969 patients, with 390 presenting during the pandemic. Patient factors were similar between the cohorts. More patients underwent surgery pre-pandemic (21.1 vs 10.3 %, p < 0.001) but crude mortality was similar at 17.3 % vs. 21.2 % (p = 0.08). The RR of undergoing surgery during the pandemic was 0.45 (95 % CI 0.32, 0.64) adjusted for age, sex, % TBSA, flame burns, and time to presentation. During the pandemic, the risk ratio for in-hospital mortality was 1.23 (95 % CI 1.01, 1.50) adjusted for age, sex, % TBSA, surgical intervention, flame burns, and time to presentation. CONCLUSIONS: During the pandemic, the probability of undergoing burn excision or grafting was significantly lower for patients, independent of the severity. Consequently, the adjusted risk of mortality was higher. To improve patient outcomes, efforts to preserve operative capacity for burn patients during periods of severe resource constraint are imperative.


Subject(s)
Burns , COVID-19 , Humans , Burn Units , Body Surface Area , Burns/epidemiology , Burns/therapy , Retrospective Studies , COVID-19/epidemiology , Pandemics , Tertiary Care Centers
12.
Andes Pediatr ; 92(6): 854-861, 2021 Dec.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1918329

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 pandemic has meant adapting to a different reality, with long-term lockdowns that might cause an increase of burns in children at home. OBJECTIVE: To compare the epidemiological situation of patients admitted to the Corporación de Ayuda al Niño Quemado (COANIQUEM) due to out patient burn injuries management at the beginning of COVID-19 lockdown with the same period the year before. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Analytical and cross-sectional study. A population of 2,027 patients under the age of 20, who were admitted to COANIQUEM for the first time with burn inju ries, between April and July of 2019 and 2020 was analyzed. The number of patients admitted each month was registered as well as their demographic, social, and clinical characteristics. The monthly percentage variation was calculated by comparing patient data in both years. RESULTS: During 2020, there was a 48.7% decrease in overall outpatient admissions. There was a relative increase of 10.5% in burns in patients under 5 years old, 18.3% in scalds, 33.1% in the number of burns in 3 or more body locations, and 16.8% in burns occurring at home. These parameters were not influenced by geographic location, sex, or socioeconomic level. CONCLUSIONS: In the first period of the COVID-19 pandemic, with strict lockdown strategies, there was a decrease in the demand for burn care, affecting both outpatients with acute burns and those who were admitted for sequelae rehabilitation, as a result of the effective decrease in the burns incidence and the reduced access to health care.


Subject(s)
Burns , COVID-19 , Adolescent , Age Distribution , Burns/epidemiology , Burns/etiology , Burns/therapy , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Child , Child, Preschool , Chile/epidemiology , Communicable Disease Control , Cross-Sectional Studies , Delivery of Health Care , Humans , Outpatients , Pandemics/prevention & control
14.
PLoS One ; 17(4): e0266400, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1896470

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Burn injuries trigger a greater and more persistent inflammatory response than other trauma cases. Exercise has been shown to positively influence inflammation in healthy and diseased populations, however little is known about the latent effect of exercise on chronic inflammation in burn injured patients. The aims of the pilot study were to assess the feasibility of implementing a long duration exercise training program, in burn injured individuals including learnings associated with conducting a clinical trial in COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Fifteen participants with a burn injury between 5-20% total body surface area acquired greater than a year ago were randomised in a within-subject designed study, into one of two conditions, exercise-control or control-exercise. The exercise condition consisted of six weeks of resistance and cardiovascular exercises, completed remotely or supervised in a hospital gym. A comprehensive outcome measurement was completed at the initial, mid and end point of each exercise and control condition. To determine the success of implementation, the feasibility indicator for the data completeness across the comprehensive outcome battery was set at 80%. RESULTS: Half (49%) of eligible participants in the timeframe, were recruited and commenced the study. Six participants withdrew prior to completion and a total of 15 participants completed the study. Eight participants were randomised to the exercise-control and seven to the control exercise group. Five participants trained remotely and seven did supervised training. Three participants completed a mix of both supervised and remote training initiated due to COVID restrictions. Outcome measures were completed on 97% of protocolised occasions and 100% of participants completed the exercise training. CONCLUSIONS: Conducting a long duration exercise training study on burn injured individuals is feasible using the described methods. The knowledge gained helps improve the methodology in larger-scale projects. Insights into the impact of COVID-19 on this clinical trial and success enhancing adaptations for the researcher, research practice and the participant, are presented.


Subject(s)
Burns , COVID-19 , Burns/complications , Burns/therapy , Exercise Therapy/methods , Feasibility Studies , Humans , Inflammation , Pandemics , Pilot Projects
15.
BMJ ; 377: o1435, 2022 06 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1891797
16.
Cir Cir ; 90(3): 419-426, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1876411

ABSTRACT

COVID-19 is a public health problem, so any burn patient who is managed as an outpatient or requires hospital management is a potential carrier of SARS-CoV-2. Burn patients are susceptible to COVID-19 due to the burn and its immunosuppressive effect, the procedures they undergo and other factors related to the burn, which makes them at high risk of contracting the disease and transmitting it, especially to the healthcare team involved in its management. Therefore, it is important to organize strategies in the services that care for burn patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. The objective of this paper is to present a proposal for response, organizational management and strategic planning in a burns service in times of COVID-19, based on the lessons and experience acquired.


La COVID-19 es un problema de salud pública, por lo que cualquier paciente quemado que se maneje como externo o que requiera manejo hospitalario es un potencial portador del SARS-CoV-2. El paciente quemado es susceptible a la COVID-19 debido a la quemadura y a su efecto inmunodepresor, a los procedimientos a los que es sometido y a otros factores inherentes a la quemadura, lo que le hace un paciente con alto riesgo de contraer la enfermedad y trasmitirla, especialmente al equipo de salud que está involucrado en su manejo. Por lo anterior, es importante organizar estrategias en los servicios que atienden pacientes con quemaduras durante la pandemia de COVID-19. El objetivo de este trabajo es presentar una propuesta para la respuesta, el manejo organizativo y la planeación estratégica en un servicio de quemados en tiempos de COVID-19, basándonos en las lecciones aprendidas y la experiencia adquirida.


Subject(s)
Burns , COVID-19 , Burns/complications , Burns/therapy , Humans , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2
17.
J Contin Educ Nurs ; 53(5): 232-240, 2022 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1834972

ABSTRACT

Background Nurses caring for pediatric patients who have burns need to be properly trained to provide optimal care. The aims of this pilot study were to (1) develop a pediatric nursing burn care e-learning training for novice nurses; (2) assess the feasibility and acceptability of this educational intervention; and (3) evaluate the preliminary effects of this intervention on novice nurses' knowledge of pediatric nursing burn care. Method A quasi-experimental, one-group, pre-test-posttest design was used. Results Feasibility was achieved because all of the participants completed the study. A significant difference was observed in the mean knowledge level of the novice nurses from before training to after training (87.7% ± 8.7% vs. 58.6% ± 14.5%; p < .001). The novice nurses' had a mean satisfaction of 95.5% after the intervention. Conclusion This new, evidence-based pediatric nursing burn care e-learning training appeared to be feasible. The novice nurses found it to be satisfactory, and it improved their knowledge regarding pediatric burn care. [J Contin Educ Nurs. 2022;53(5):232-240.].


Subject(s)
Burns , Computer-Assisted Instruction , Nurses , Child , Clinical Competence , Humans , Pediatric Nursing , Pilot Projects
18.
J Burn Care Res ; 43(4): 766-771, 2022 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1831230

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to anxiety and fears for the general public. It is unclear how the behavior of people with acute burns and the services available to them has changed during the pandemic. The aim of our observational study was to evaluate our clinic's experience with patients presenting with burns during the first 10 months of the COVID-19 pandemic and determine if delays in presentation and healthcare delivery exist within our burn population. Patients referred to our clinic from March 1, 2020 to December 15, 2020 were reviewed for time of presentation after injury. We defined a true delay in presentation of >5 days from date of injury to date of referral for patients who were not inpatients at our facility or received initial care elsewhere prior to referral. Of the 246 patients who were referred to our clinic, during this time period, 199 patients (80.89%) attended their appointments. Our in-person clinic volume from referrals increased in July 2020 with a sharp decrease in August 2020. Our total clinic volume decreased in 2020 from 2019 by about 14%. Referrals to our clinic decreased in 2020 from 2019 by about 34%. Video telehealth visits did not account for the decrease in visits. There was low incidence of delays in presentation to our clinic during the pandemic. Additional investigation is necessary to see if the incidence of burn injury decreased. Despite the pandemic, our clinic remained ready and open to serve the burn population.


Subject(s)
Burns , COVID-19 , Telemedicine , Ambulatory Care Facilities , Burns/epidemiology , Burns/therapy , COVID-19/epidemiology , Humans , Pandemics , Referral and Consultation
19.
J Burn Care Res ; 43(6): 1410-1415, 2022 11 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1806447

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted the lives of billions of people globally. Some medical systems continue to be overburdened due to the viral illness leading to incredible public health challenges domestically as well as abroad. However, with vaccination distribution increasing globally, many are pushing for a return to some form of normalcy. In the medical community, some are weighing the risks of returning to global health missions and considering protective strategies to minimize risk of viral spread. Here, we describe our experience in returning to an annual burn reconstruction mission in a low- and middle-income country. We have successfully carried out a return surgical mission trip. Our team of 10 individuals was able to perform over 75 procedures on 25 pediatric patients in 4 operative days. We applied a variety of protective strategies and altered mission protocol to limit exposure and transmission risk while focusing heavily on education and training. Additionally, we increased the use of telemedicine and eliminated typical in-person clinic visits. We increased operative complexity to increase impact while limiting patient exposure. Rigorous perioperative safety and follow-up protocols were implemented. The increased use of telemedicine, reduction of in-person visits, emphasis on education, and implementation of safety and follow-up protocols have led to an improvement in efficiency, safety, and accountability. Our adaptations have provided guidance on responsibly resuming surgical outreach missions, with changes that are likely to endure beyond the COVID-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
Burns , COVID-19 , Telemedicine , Humans , Child , Pandemics , Ukraine
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL